Close

Donate today to keep Global Voices strong!

Our global community of volunteers work hard every day to bring you the world's underreported stories -- but we can't do it without your help. Support our editors, technology, and advocacy campaigns with a donation to Global Voices!

Donate now

China: Over 100,000 Weibo Users Punished for Violating ‘Censorship Guidelines’

The “ideological battle” against online public opinion leaders and “Internet celebrities” constitutes only one front on the ever-broadening battlefield of online censorship in China. On another front lies a new “code of conduct,” a series of punishments to penalize netizens who act out of line.

According to the Beijing District Joint Platform Against Rumor, more than 103,673 Sina Weibo users have been penalized since August 2013 for violating the Weibo “community code of practice (CoP)” and the “Seven Self-Censorship Guidelines“.

An official release alleges [zh] that among the penalized Weibo users:

  • 1,030 distributed untruthful information
  • 75,264 published personal attack comments
  • 14,357 harassed other users
  • 3,773 published indecent and obscene materials
  • 9,246 engaged in other forms of misconduct such as copying other users’ content

The newly implemented community penalties range from temporary account suspension to permanent deletion of accounts.

The Joint Platform Against Rumor is a self-governing platform formed by 22 online media outlets and led by the Beijing City Internet Information Office and Beijing Internet Association. The online media outlets are supposed to contribute to the battle against online rumors according to the Seven Self-Censorship Guidelines put forward by the State Internet Information Office on August 10, 2013.

22 online media outlets signed up to joint-hands in cracking down rumors. Screen capture image.

22 online media outlets signed up to join hands in cracking down rumors. Screen capture image.

Originally, the Weibo CoP implemented by the CoP Community Center only sought to suppress the spread of commercial spam, indecent material, and rumors. However, judging from the newly released data, the target of the crackdown has shifted. Roughly 75% of the users are being punished for posting “personal attack comments” — but what constitutes a “personal attack” is highly arbitrary and entirely at the discretion of authorities. As one netizen pointed out, “this is just an excuse to silence those who are critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)”. Another user pointed out that the Party-sponsored online commentators are “immune to” the community rule even when they have launched personal attack comments against political liberals. It appears that the so-called “community” rule only applies to dissenting voices.

The Sina Weibo data has shed some light on the disappearance of online “critical comments” in the past three months – dissenters have been forbidden to speak out online and ordinary netizens are slowly being disciplined into behaving as passive consumers of online information through the imposition of “community code of practice.”

4 comments

  • […] more than a thousand were punished for “distributing untruthful information,” feeding suspicion that Beijing’s ostensible rumor crackdown is really a cloaked attack on dissent. From Oiwan Lam at Global Voices […]

  • Fascinating. There are so many fronts to Chinese controls on speech. The combination of community self-policing on Weibo and the conflation of actually abusive speech with political or social dissent is once again a hallmark of the trend. Is there a backlash of any kind against Weibo, or any social media joking or resistance in the form of punning and other language games?

  • […] Tens of thousands of Sina Weibo users are being punished for posting "personal attack comments" or re-publishing messages posted by other users. Welcome to China's ever-broadening battlefield of online censorship.  […]

  • […] We’ve written a number of times of the various ways in which China tries to police its online world. These include punishing individuals, as well as imposing general rules that apply to everybody. Until now, it’s been hard to tell to what extent the latter were just saber-rattling. Now we know, thanks to a new post on the Global Voices site… […]

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.