<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Voices Advocacy &#187; Kazakhstan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/categories/countries/kazakhstan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org</link>
	<description>Defending Free Speech Online</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Kazakhstan blocks opposition websites</title>
		<link>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/10/25/kazakhstan-blocks-opposition-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/10/25/kazakhstan-blocks-opposition-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sami Ben Gharbia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/10/25/kazakhstan-blocks-opposition-websites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 18, 2007, Kazakhstan has blocked access to a number of independent websites switching off main opposition outlets including kub.kz, geo.kz, zonakz.net and inkar.info.
 “All those websites published links to audiofiles of telephone conversations of high-ranking officials in Kazakhstan, freely available on the Net” Rachid Nougmanov, from the International Freedom Network, said in an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 18, 2007, Kazakhstan has blocked access to a number of independent websites switching off main opposition outlets including <a href="http://kub.kz/">kub.kz</a>, <a href="http://geo.kz/">geo.kz</a>, <a href="http://zonakz.net/">zonakz.net</a> and <a href="http://inkar.info/">inkar.info</a>.</p>
<p> “<em>All those websites published links to audiofiles of telephone conversations of high-ranking officials in Kazakhstan, freely <a href="http://www.kub.info/article.php?sid=19691">available</a> on <a href="http://www.kub.info/article.php?sid=19763">the Net</a></em>” Rachid Nougmanov, from the <a href="http://ifn.org.uk/">International Freedom Network</a>, said in an email.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSL2470624120071024?sp=true">According to Reuters</a>: “<em>In the transcripts, officials use strong language to discuss Nazarbayev&#8217;s ex son-in-law, Rakhat Akiyev, who fell out with the Kazakh leader this year and currently lives in exile in Europe.</em>”</p>
<p>On October 23, <a href="http://kub.kz/">Kub.kz</a> has been officially notified of its closure by the Kazakhstan Network Information Center (KazNIC). Here is a copy of the letter:</p>
<p><img src='http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/iedf-kz.gif' alt='kub.kz suspended' /></p>
<p>It seems that this is not the first time that <a href="http://kub.kz/">Kub.kz</a> has been blocked. According to the <a href="http://www.osce.org/item/25667.html">last report</a> (<a href="http://www.osce.org/publications/rfm/2007/07/25667_918_en.pdf">PDF</a>) from the <a href="http://www.osce.org">Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe</a> - “<em>Internet Governance in Kazakhstan</em>”, by Rachid Nougmanov - which paints a grim picture of the Internet situation in the country, “<em>kub.kz was blocked for more than three years by Kazakhtelecom and Nursat, from January 2002 to April 2005.</em>”</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>The situation with the four sites points directly at the violation of people&#8217;s constitutional rights,</em>&#8221; <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSL2470624120071024?sp=true">the blocked website owners</a> said in a statement issued jointly with human rights activists and online journalists during a press-conference in Almaty. &#8220;<em>It is clear that whoever ordered them to be blocked did not think much about the legality of their actions. They were most likely driven by political considerations</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>In December 2005, the right to use the domain name borat.kz owned by the English comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, who had made the controversial film &#8220;<a href="http://www.boratdvd.com/">Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan</a>&#8220;, was suspended by the Association of IT Companies. “<em>We’ve done this so he can’t badmouth Kazakhstan under the .kz domain name</em>,” the Association’s President <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060907/borat_premiere_060907/20060908?s_name=tiff2006&#038;no_ads=">Nurlan Isin said</a>. “<em>He can go and do whatever he wants at other domains.</em>”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/10/25/kazakhstan-blocks-opposition-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European study on legal frameworks for censorship released</title>
		<link>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/28/european-study-on-legal-frameworks-for-censorship-released/</link>
		<comments>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/28/european-study-on-legal-frameworks-for-censorship-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Kennedy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/28/european-study-on-legal-frameworks-for-censorship-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe has issued a lengthy report looking at the legal and constitutional frameworks on which state governments are basing practices of internet censorship. For Kazakhstan, the report finds, domestic threats to information security are defined as widely as &#8220;unlawful activities of political and economic organizations in creating, disseminating, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_for_Security_and_Co-operation_in_Europe">Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe</a> has issued <a href="http://www.osce.org/fom/item_11_25667.html">a lengthy report</a> looking at the legal and constitutional frameworks on which state governments are <a href="http://techpolicysummit.blogs.com/tech_policy_summit/2007/07/the-organisatio.html">basing practices of internet censorship</a>. For <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstan">Kazakhstan</a>, the report finds, domestic threats to information security are defined as widely as &#8220;unlawful activities of political and economic organizations in creating, disseminating, and using information&#8221; and &#8220;the system whereby political parties and civic organizations popularize their views in the media.&#8221; Before moving on to look at legal linguistic loopholes in <a href="http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship">other countries</a> such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_%28country%29">Georgia</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvia">Latvia</a>, the segment on Kazakhstan explores the cases of three bloggers who had previously been arrested—beaten and jailed in one case: <a href="http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/05/25/kazakhstan-against-bashization/">Sergey Duvanov</a>, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2tg8no">Kazis Toguzbayev</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;newwindow=1&#038;safe=off&#038;q=Andrei+Sviridov&#038;btnG=Search">Andrey Sviridov</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/07/28/european-study-on-legal-frameworks-for-censorship-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
